Varicose Vulva Images

passes on" life instructions "

  the concerns of 
 ***, reading 
 Perec's book, 
 are probably shared by many of those 
 
 trying to read it. 
 no attempt to refute the de gustibus 
: the DeGustibus 
 giustibus is, and without doubt La Vita 
 Instructions for Use 
 is not for everyone, although opera 'unive 
 rsale'. Not for everyone but if 
 for many, across seas and many 
 (for 
 Mari 
 ICUR s). 
 
 
 there are not only 
 
 lists and descriptions, in 
 LVIPLU; 
 there are many stories 
; 
 
 there are at least 179 stories (in groups of 60, the third 
 maimed - God forbid!). 
 some complicated and challenging stories, other 
 simple anecdotes of everyday life. (179 
 least the stories are listed in Chapter 60, rather than illuminating chapter about 
 for various 
 you expect). All stories, like 
 
 objects and characters are intertwined in places 
 
 of 
 Parisian building which is the 'capital' and the center of the universe LaVIPLUiano. 
 wanting to give a possible key to reading the text 
 (perigliosissimo intent and consciously re 
 duction, in the case of a work-world), I would say that 
 LVIPLU tells the extraordinary, 
 the complexity and richness of everyday 
 Diana (1 ). 
 
 
 casual-mathematical structure that generates 
 stories 
 in their braided and the way to tell the 
 be deduced from the journals to 
 c, but know it is only a deepening 
, an excavation 
 
 but not necessary for first reading (
 an excavation that does not reveal much tut 
 to). The excavation may make sense in q 
 ow may know other parts of 
 ll'universo LaVIPLUiano; s not much 
 enso if it serves to make the census or the collection 
 by fan-atic. 
 but the point is that a read only by exegetes 
 hermeneutic is wrong or (2) (
 pretty obvious, eh). 
 
 
 short, 
 "Life, instr uction 
 for use" does not need 
 
 instruction 
 
 for u know. 
 
 still a massive presence 
 appropriate, accurate randomizer 
 of narrative elements, it is - imho - what more do 
 
 intent to conceal from the game structure of the work: 
 the case in the text. is also the artificial reproduction of 
 
 how to implement in reality 
, the extraordinary nature of everyday 
. something reminiscent of the "rag 
 Thurs green" Rohmer - vaguely - in the sense there 
 rto - no, in fact, better cancel 
 Rohmer: it does not clear, I think. 
 the game, the case, the role of chance 
 
 in games, the role of chance it 
 
 lle 
 stories of everyday 
 (here). 
 
 
 to better say, the combination 
 ation and inter 
 secarsi 
 of many events, people 
 oday, objects 
 puts in evidence 
 
 
 continuity between what is trivial and what is right 
 golare, and the possibility theses 
 (1) is that everything is strange and nothing is 
 extraordinary veterinarian, as a whole. every card counts, and already 
 Ochi, well, the games are a serious matter 
 as the other, in reality 
 daily. 
 (and com ele 
 nque 
 
 nchi 
 are reading 
 _potenziale_ 
 beautiful 
 other 
 that.) 
 
 
 
 then there is the way to tell: 
 Perec tells his stories in a more detached 
 Not really 
 chronicles: 
 rather not judge: the story - 
 and articles 
 - 
 speak for themselves. However, there is no doubt 
 
 
 that, say, the famous painter of course 
 
 ambition, cunning and ruthlessness 
, while Article 
 igiano Winckler has not in itself 
 nothin 'more than integrity, 
 care, precision 
 zeal, and even grotesque in history 
 
 
 the art critic who tries in all ways to buy 
 
 puzzle Bartlebooth 
 Perec says his (and makes fun of the system 
 not covertly 
 market 
 and criticism of art of his time). 
 
 
 all 
 what you could tell 
 better? 
 I doubt it. who thinks 
 face examples. 
 is done ("done", so to speak 
) 
 
 know so that a universal re 
 ccamente populated 
 created in retaining more do eq 
 uilibrio 
 form and content (and thus a form MACR 
 oscope prot agonist, and 
 rigid in some respects vin 
 and leaking) is a company unique and makes pressure 
 sochi text 
 a classic of literature and a map of 
 a world that is diametrically opposed to the 
 Plotlandia where dwells the most 
 
 writers. 
 
 
 
 pb (1) of course this is false, and then deny it.